Director: Ron
Howard | Starring:
Tom Hanks, Audrey Tautou, Ian McKellen,
Jean Reno, Alfred Molina
Released: 2006
| Runtime: 149m
| Rating (out of 5):
** |
|
I look back through
Ron Howard's filmography and I see a list of films that are just plain
boring. The man has a knack for taking what should be inspiring and
exciting and making it plodding and ordinary. Take, for example, a
car chase through the streets of Paris in this film. Audrey Tautou
is driving this weird little European car backwards and forwards through
the streets trying to evade the French cops, and I swear I almost
nodded off during it. What should have been fun and thrilling (it's
a car chase, for God's sake) was rendered snoozeriffic by bad direction
and editing. I literally looked up afterwards and asked if that was
it, or if I missed something. There were many other scenes that ended
strangely or abruptly and others that just kind of petered out. I'd
say the whole thing just wasn't very artful. I mean, how else do you
fuck up one of the most popular novels of all time? The thing was
a perfect text to put on screen, and there are any number of directors
that could have hit it out of the park, but we got Mr. Slow Motion,
Ron Howard. To be fair, I didn't read the book, but I got the general
gist of the thing from the millions of others who did prior to seeing
the movie, and all the elements were there. It seems one of the issues
that plague Howard's films also plagues this one: he falls in love
with a few scenes, and films them as loving pieces of art and then
just kind of fills in the gaps in between these scenes with slice-and-dice
filler. You can tell exactly what those scenes he loves are by watching
the trailer for the film. They're generally filmed in slow motion
or in some sort of chiaroscuro lighting scheme. Think of Apollo
13 and that slow walk to the capsule, or A
Beautiful Mind and the first reveal of the backyard shed with
all of the wacky notes on the walls. Sure, those scenes are relatively
memorable and "artistic," but for every one of those scenes, there
are bad car chases, horribly choppy gun battles, and filmed dialogues
that could put a speed freak to sleep. Perhaps there was just too
much info in the book to fully cover it all in the movie, or perhaps
the scriptwriter, Akiva
Goldsman (who ruined the Batman franchise with scripts for the
atrocious sequels Batman
Forever and Batman
& Robin), just screwed up the biggest opportunity he's ever
had, or ever will have. Did I mention that Audrey Tautou (from Amelie)
is absolutely adorable--and completely unbelievable as a police cryptologist--and
that Tom Hanks' hair just completely creeped me out and distracted
me for most of the movie? I can see why the Catholic church wasn't
very happy about this book and movie, but, really, they get upset
about a couple of guys just wanting to get married, so what's wrong
with calling the whole existence of your religion into question? [On
Demand]
|
|
|
Booze
& Grub
Reviews of New York City's most popular (and least
popular) bars and restaurants. |
Hipster
Book Reviews This much ignorance
about literature can only lead to hurt feelings and a whole lot of
nonsense. |
Music
Check out the albums that have left Mr. H with permanent hearing loss in his left ear, but a song in his heart |
|