|
One cannot question
Mr. Ritchie's dedication to his craft (except for that foray into
p-whipped nepotistic tomfoolery). The man clearly has a damn good
time making his films, adores his characters and puts every ounce
of himself into their presentation. But despite this, it's hard to
ignore his early Tarantino/Boyle
worship and penchant for ripping scenes and shots almost verbatim
from their films. Or, even if not direct rips, shows his adoration
all over the celluloid (or magnetic digital tape or whatever they
shoot on these days). Now don't get me wrong,
there aren't movies I'd rather see than True
Romance, Shallow
Grave, Pulp
Fiction and Trainspotting
(favorites all), but somehow Ritchie's films feel like the JV version
of these now classics. Okay, Snatch felt
like the JV version--this one was more like the sophomore team,
if there's such a thing. And I actually liked Snatch a
lot, so this unfortunate comparison doesn't necessarily sink this
film.
What Ritchie does do well is draw colorful and complicated
cartoon characters. No, these are not the fully fleshed out character
studies you'd find in a Paul Thomas
Andersen movie or tear-your-heart-out novel adaptation, because
these characters still need to steal cars, shoot guns, be made to
look like idiots (even the toughest of them) and eventually end
up smirking in triumph. Certainly cartoon characters, but endlessly
entertaining ones. This stems from the snappy dialogue, especially
in this case from the thought-to-be-dead rock star, Johnny Quid.
Raised in a wealthy family and sent to all the best schools as a
boy, he is now a self-conscience junky pooh-poohing society and
all that comes with it. He is the skeletal voice of a generation
in decline, and he's damn funny. He's easily the most interesting
character in the film.
Among the other characters is 300's
Gerard Butler as the leader of a gang of hooligans with hearts of
gold (sort of). At least when he says he has his brother's back,
he means it literally (you'll see). There’s the “old-school”
British gangster, Tom Wilkinson, who is always awesome. And there’s
sexy, but corrupt lawyer Thandie Newton. She’s easy on the
eyes, but cold as ice. It’s a nice, well-rounded group of
quirky characters, not at all unlike the nice group of quirky, nicknamed
low-lifes in Snatch.
The camera shots are skewed, the editing quick and the style nothing
but modern adrenaline. The man does know how to aim a camera. The
man can also spin a yarn, although for some it might come off as
a bit convoluted. There’s a lot of borrowing from Peter to
pay Paul to rip off Jesus (or whomever) all filtered though the
muffled low-class brogue that most of the characters tend to speak—if
they’re not speaking Russian. I kind of like the pretzels
that he creates with his narratives, but the Missus shook her head
in frustration several times, and eventually gave up trying to figure
out who was screwing whom. I always find pausing and recapping with
a loved one works for me. It’s not an easy film to just have
on in the background, unless you want to just kind of spy the eye
candy as it rolls past. And, funny enough, Guy seems to really aim
his films to guys. This ain’t The
Notebook, it ain’t Love
Actually and there isn’t even a whiff of Jennifer
Aniston, Kate
Hudson or Drew
Barrymore anywhere. Dudes welcome. [On
Demand]
|