| |
|
| |
 |
|
(2007)
rt: 117m **½
Director: Sidney Lumet
Starring: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Ethan Hawke, Albert Finney, Marisa
Tomei
The first stumbling block here is the overly clumsy
title. It's a book title, not a movie title. It doesn't roll off the
tongue. It doesn't shorten to a nice concise two-word blurt as you
casually throw your ten bucks at the box office cashier. But it's
Sidney Lumet, so what do we expect?
Part caper movie, part family drama, part weak attempt at an 82-year-old
trying to make a Quentin
Tarantino movie, Lumet delivers something that had all the makings
of a taught thriller with a heart, but turned into a battle of overacting,
convoluted plot devices and the stench of 1980-something all over
it.
The plot is relatively straightforaward. You have two brothers: an
older, domineering one and a younger one who snivels and cowers. Hoffman
plays the bizarrely 1980s-feeling older sibling who loves the drugs,
and has built up a nasty habit that has put him in a big hole. Hawke
is the younger brother who has a good heart, but is a total broke
mess with absolutely no self-confidence or purpose. The first thing
you're saying to yourself is, "Uh, yeah, they might as well have
cast John
Leguizamo and Cheech
Marin as family." I gotta say that trying to picture them
as related was seriously distracting. That aside, they kind of played
to type, Hoffman talking a lot, huffing and puffing and being intimidating
and Hawke sulking and sweating and shaking his head and mumbling a
lot. It's clear to everyone that Hawke's character is in deep need,
as he is trying to pay alimony and child support to his ex-wife while
pulling down practically nothing and living in a crap apartment. From
the outside, Hoffman is doing well. He's the CFO (or thereabouts)
of a real estate company, has his own office and nice apartment and
is married to a surprisingly sexy (and naked) Marisa Tomei. Why she'd
be married to this slob (Hoffman looks worse in this movie than I've
ever seen him) is beyond all of us. Especially given the fact she
is actually meeting Hawke every day on his lunch break to ride him
raw.
So, you have this set up. Two guys in dire straights over money, with
the added element of a secret love triangle. And here comes the plot
device. The two brothers' parents happen to own a jewelry store in
a strip mall in Westchester. This is a store they are familiar with
and know is well insured. So Hoffman pitches the plot to his little
brother that they knock over the jewelry store while this older woman
mans it one Saturday morning. Nobody gets hurt, they get the money
from the heist and their parents get the insurance money. Perfect!
Of course, Hoffman being the fat douchebag drug addict embezzler that
he is convinces his not-so-bright bro to do the actual robbery, while
he just acts as the planner and eventual fence. Hawke, after much
coaxing, eventually agrees, and the plot is on!
And that's when things go all Tarantino. Hawke brings some scumbag
with him to the robbery that he knows from a bar (and just happens
to have armed robbery experience). He, instead of Hawke (who chickens
out), goes in to rob the place. Unbeknownst to the brothers, the woman
who's normally there has called in sick, and their mother is there
instead. And what an Annie Oakley type she turns out to be. A gun
battle ensues, and everyone (all two of 'em) end up bleeding and dead.
Bad news.
Enter Albert Finney. The man hasn't met a scene he hasn't wanted to
eat whole. From the Daniel
Day Lewis school of turning red, spitting and growling, he proceeds
to overact his way through the rest of the film as the grieving and
vengeful father. He's unaware his children were the ones who got his
wife killed, of course, and always seems on the verge of figuring
it out. But maybe he really knows in his heart the entire time.
There is one more very Tarantino scene in which a crazed and desperate
Hoffman shoots his way into his drug dealer's luxury apartment, blowing
away several people and stealing drugs and money (that are sitting
in an open safe). And the rest of the movie is spent watching the
family unravel. There are some taught scenes in which Finney tamps
it down a bit, and we see that he clearly was very tough on his older
son growing up and actually loved the younger "puppy dog"
of a younger boy in Hawke better. In this wrenching discussion is
the only mention of my above contention that the two actors look nothing
alike--the fact the disparity in attractiveness is supposed to be
obvious. The movie ends with one last shoot out and then mercifully
ends in probably the only way it really can end. All dicks must die.
[DVD, MF]
|
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
Home
| Booze & Grub
| Movies | Music
| Books | Diary
| Randomness
|
|
| |
|