
Buy on Amazon
|
While somehow pulling
an A- in college in philosophy 101without ever cracking a book, I
remember precious little of what I babbled on and on about in the
essay-based exams. I do remember studying nihilism at some point,
and while I know that Bukowski's very thinly veiled alter ego, Henry
Chianski, is no nihilist, that was the term that kept coming to mind
as he slogged through what amounts to a pretty meaningless life. Call
him a nihilist with a heart.
Chianski is a matter of fact guy. He's a plain-talking, plain speaking
son-of-a-bitch who takes no shit and pulls no punches. He drinks hard,
plays the ponies and treats women like a cross between a field horse
and a coat rack. He's a purely reactionary human being, mostly reacting
to people and situations with either rancor or indifference. Boss
gives him crap: rancor. His live-in girl tells him she's cheating
and moves out: indifference. So indifferent that he helps her pack
and find an apartment without so much as a "why?"
He will occasionally show flashes of humanity, but even his pity or
sorrow are kind of illuminated at the 1000-foot level while he stands
below, a disinterested observer. Sounds like the perfect employee
for the post office, right? Chip on the shoulder, detached, rudderless.
Unlike Bukowski himself, Chianski has no dreams of being a writer
or anything beyond a post office drone. Well, he actually has dreams
of not being a drone. But beyond that he really has no urge to do
anything but getting through his day without somebody pissing him
off or infringing on his drink time.
There is a definite Raymond Carver feel to Bukowski's writing in the
way that he can write simply while still conveying a rich undertone
of unsettled emotion. Granted, his prose is lot more raw, less refined
and filled with the frank language of the character he's describing.
It's an odd thing writing about lower class whites in an urban setting,
as even being a native Los Angelino myself, I had trouble recognizing
this sub-class as being part of that larger city in which I grew up.
It wasn't really until I read about Bukowski and his ties to L.A.
that I realized Henry Chianski wasn't somewhere in the Midwest, but
in the second most populous urban center in the US. Will I read the
rest of the Chianski saga? Maybe I'll spread them out and read one
every five years or so to keep myself motivated to move forward.
|